Comparison critique of 2 famous speeches Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Comparison critique of 2 famous dustupes - Essay ExampleIn Kennedys address, he used both(prenominal) ethos and pathos to convince the interview that under his leadership significant ties that allegedly bind the country to other foreign governments would slip away through his offer and pledges of loyalty, hope, good deed, and a call for peace. They both exuded the air of confidence during the whole duration of the speech and assuming ample preparedness foregoing to the delivery. Though both were glancing at some previously prepared notes on the speech, it was clearly evident that they knew most of the contents of the speech and frequent glancing was enough to check off that the delivery flowed perfectly and stiffly. Their appearances were both sublime and very professional donning formal suits with respective neckties and hair perfectly groomed. Likewise, both employed sustaining a particular bankers bill that uses emphasis and clarity in pronunciation, diction and use of flaw less grammar. Both speakers, during their course of delivery, were intermittently applauded by the audience, to signify conformity and approval to their points of assertions. Both Reagan and Kennedy knew the effective use of body language that employs glancing at the audience, looking at them through their eyes, briefly glancing on their notes, changing their facial focus to the right, the middle and the left fragment of the audience, and using the appropriate tone and marks of emphasis, as needed. Likewise, in terms of audience orientation, it was evident in both speeches that the audience impact and appeal were both positive. Intermittent claps were heard, especially when the speakers noted some relevant arguments that were appropriately supported or when figurative languages were used. The fact that these speakers were the ones who delivered the speeches resulted in an enhanced credibility and audience appeal. If the speech were delivered by somebody else, it could have signific antly affected audience impact, depending on the persons character, the manner of delivery, air of confidence, and manifested authority, among others. Concurrently, there were disparities between the delivery, style, and focus or thrusts of these two speeches. In Reagans speech, he did not begin the speech by acknowledging the presence of personalities who were present unlike Kennedys speech which begun with acknowledging the following debility President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens (John F. Kennedy Inaugural Address par. 1). Reagans introduction was simply to acknowledge gratitude from the audience by repeatedly saying Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you and good evening (A TIME FOR CHOOSING (The Speech October 27, 1964) par. 1). Likewise, the speed of Reagans speech was faster, as compared to the slower paced and significantly rehearsed pacing by Kennedy. The total nu mber of words